Click Here to Email This Story to a Friend Click Here for a Printer Friendly Version
Scout.com RSS Feeds 
Plus/minus: MBB vs. Stanford Premium Story
Jerome Randle and Harper Kamp

Posted Feb 25, 2008

For those wondering why Sunday's Cal's 79-69 loss to Stanford had a familiar feel, it's because the Bears digging themselves out of a first half deficit to make the game close at halftime, only to fall back into another big deficit to start the second half and then making it close again happened in Cal's 82-77 loss to Stanford last month.

Stanford 79, California 69

Player Min +Pts -Pts Pts Reb Ast Diff
Harper Kamp 17 37 28 7 4 1 +9
Nikola Knezevic 14 30 25 3 1 3 +5
Jamal Boykin 23 43 39 7 4 1 +4
David Liss 1 3 2 0 1 0 +1
Nican Robinson 0+ 0 0 0 0 0 0
Jordan Wilkes 8 15 17 6 1 0 -2
Patrick Christopher 40 69 77 15 4 0 -8
DeVon Hardin 23 37 46 5 5 0 -9
Eric Vierneisel 12 15 29 2 1 0 -14
Ryan Anderson 34 55 72 15 11 0 -17
Jerome Randle 28 41 60 9 1 7 -19

After spending chunks of each half digging itself out of holes, the question is whether the Bears could have done anything to prevent themselves from getting into such big holes in the first place.  The answer, is a decided yes.

Using a starting lineup of Randle, Christopher, Vierneisel, Anderson, and Hardin, the Bears quickly fell behind 13-7, and eventually trailed 23-9.  They managed to narrow the deficit to four (33-29) at halftime because of a few factors: a) Nikola Knezevic managed to steady the team offensively, b) the front court grouping of Boykin, Hardin, and Kamp was effective (+9 in 3:13), and c) they went the rest of the half with three big people out of Hardin, Boykin, Anderson, Kamp, and Wilkes.

So what happens in the second half? The Bears open with the exact same starting lineup and gradually go from being down four to being down nine, before Knezevic is brought in to supply some poise to the offense.  The frontcourt grouping of Boykin, Hardin, and Kamp never took the court together in the second half, although the Bears didn't go back to just having two bigs until they were down 10 with less than two minutes left.

The most aggravating part is that this exact same scenario took place against Oregon a couple of weeks ago.  The starting lineup fell behind 8-0 and eventually 11-4 before a substitution was made.  The Bears scraped their way back to a two-point deficit (34-32) at halftime.  The same starting lineup goes back out and went from being down two to being down 10 before a substitution was made.

First vs. Second Half (minimum 2 minutes)

First Half Top - Nikola Knezevic - 16-8, +8
Second Half Top - Harper Kamp - 21-15, +6

First Half Bottom - Ryan Anderson - 20-33, -13
Second Half Bottom - DeVon Hardin - 15-26, -11

Difference Makers

With Harper Kamp in 17 minutes - 37-28, +9
Without Kamp in 23 minutes - 32-51, -19

With Nikola Knezevic in 14 minutes - 30-25, +5
Without Knezevic in 26 minutes - 39-54, -15

With Jamal Boykin in 23 minutes - 43-39, +4
Without Boykin in 17 minutes - 26-40, -14

With Eric Vierneisel in 12 minutes - 15-29, -14
Without Vierneisel in 28 minutes - 54-50, +4

With Ryan Anderson in 34 minutes - 55-72, -17
Without Anderson in 6 minutes - 14-7, +7

With Jerome Randle in 28 minutes - 41-60, -19
Without Randle in 12 minutes - 28-19, +9

Lineups

Take away the play of the starting lineup and the Bears played Stanford even.

Starting lineup
Randle, Christopher, Vierneisel, Anderson, Hardin in 11:07 - 15-26, -11
All other lineups in 28:53 - 54-53, +1

Point guard combinations

Randle only 26:36 39-54, -15
Knezevic only 10:46 25-17, +8
Randle and Knezevic 1:35 2-6, -4
Knezevic and Liss 0:45 3-2, +1
Robinson, Knezevic, and Liss 0:18 0-0, 0
  40:00 69-79, -10

Big player combinations

Boykin, Anderson, and Kamp 11:33 25-21, +4
Anderson and Hardin 11:07 15-26, -11
Wilkes, Anderson, and Hardin 4:09 8-7, +1
Boykin, Hardin, and Kamp 3:13 9-0, +9
Boykin, Anderson, and Hardin 2:52 0-6, -6
Boykin, Wilkes, and Hardin 2:25 5-7, -2
Anderson and Kamp 1:53 3-7, -4
Boykin, Wilkes, and Anderson 1:17 2-3, -1
Wilkes, Anderson, and Kamp 0:37 0-0, 0
Boykin and Anderson 0:36 2-2, 0
Boykin only 0:18 0-0, 0
  40:00 69-79, -10

Big player combinations summary

Three bigs 26:06 49-44, +5
Two bigs 13:36 20-35, -15
One big 0:18 0-0, 0
  40:00 69-79, -10

Contribution Evaluation

Player Minutes Expected Actual Difference
Kamp 17 -4.25 +9 +13.25
Boykin 23 -5.75 +4 +9.75
Knezevic 14 -3.50 +5 +8.50
Christopher 40 -10.00 -8 +2.00
Liss 1 -0.25 +1 +1.25
Robinson 0+ -- -- --
Wilkes 8 -2.00 -2 0
Hardin 23 -5.75 -9 -3.25
Anderson 34 -8.50 -17 -8.50
Vierneisel 12 -3.00 -14 -11.00
Randle 28 -7.00 -19 -12.00

Description: This stat measures the significance of a player's contribution to the team's effort. If a team wins by 10 points, and a player plays in half of the team's minutes, his expected contribution would be a +5. For example, when Cal defeated Grambling by 19 points. Brian Wethers played 28 minutes or 70% of the game. If we multiply 70% x +19, Wethers' expected contribution would be a +13.30. But for the game he was a +26, so his net for the game for a +12.70. In a perfect team situation, if everyone contributed equally, the difference column would consist of a row of zeros.

Stanford combined

Player Min +Pts -Pts Pts Reb Ast Diff
Harper Kamp 28 61 43 9 4 1 +18
David Liss 1 3 2 0 1 0 +1
Nikola Knezevic 20 38 38 3 1 3 0
Nican Robinson 0+ 0 1 0 0 0 -1
Jamal Boykin 46 84 86 21 12 2 -2
Jordan Wilkes 10 15 22 6 1 0 -7
DeVon Hardin 42 70 79 22 9 0 -9
Patrick Christopher 74 139 154 31 12 3 -15
Eric Vierneisel 45 80 100 7 4 1 -20
Ryan Anderson 72 132 152 26 19 3 -20
Jerome Randle 62 108 128 21 8 14 -20
146

Two numbers standout here: how much better the Bears do when Harper Kamp is in the game, and how much worse they do when Eric Vierneisel's playing.

During the 28 minutes that Kamp played, the Bears outscored Stanford 61-43, for a +18.  During the 52 minutes that he was on the bench, the Bears were outscored 118-85 (-33), for an overall difference of 51 points.  Kamp topped the plus/minus against Stanford in both games, with a +9 each time.

Although three Bears had a combined -20, Vierneisel stands out because his total was achieved in just 45 minutes.  During that time, the Bears were outscored 100-80.  During the 35 minutes that he rested, Cal outscored Stanford 66-61, or was a +5, for an overall difference of  25 points.


©Copyright 2008, TheBearInsider.com and Scout.com. All rights reserved.

If you haven't done so already, subscribe to The Bear Insider so you can participate in this online community and get access to the members-only content from the nationwide Insiders network.

Bear Insider staff writers visit the Insider discussion board regularly, and are available to discuss questions you may have about this article and Cal Athletics.



Related Stories
Plus/minus: MBB vs. Arizona State
 -by TheBearInsider.com  Feb 17, 2008
MBB: Plus/minus vs. Oregon
 -by TheBearInsider.com  Feb 10, 2008
Plus/minus: MBB, WBB vs. Oregon St.
 -by TheBearInsider.com  Feb 8, 2008

Story Tools
Top Stories 
Search Stories 
Discuss on Forums 
MAGAZINE COVERAGE
Get the 2008 Scout.com Recruiting Guides (Post-LOI and Fall Preview) with an annual Total Access Pass
Sign Up Today!

Upgrade Now!
NEW! Free Email Newsletter
Don't miss any news or features from TheBearInsider.com. Subscribe to our newsletter to have our newest articles emailed to you on a daily or weekly basis.

Add Topics to My HotList
Get free email alerts with news about your favorite topics. Click link to add to My HotList.
Basketball > California
[View My HotList]