![]() |
![]() |
|
Plus/minus: MBB vs. Stanford
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
For those wondering why Sunday's Cal's 79-69 loss to Stanford had a familiar feel, it's because the Bears digging themselves out of a first half deficit to make the game close at halftime, only to fall back into another big deficit to start the second half and then making it close again happened in Cal's 82-77 loss to Stanford last month. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Stanford 79, California 69
After spending chunks of each half digging itself out of holes, the question is whether the Bears could have done anything to prevent themselves from getting into such big holes in the first place. The answer, is a decided yes. Using a starting lineup of Randle, Christopher, Vierneisel, Anderson, and Hardin, the Bears quickly fell behind 13-7, and eventually trailed 23-9. They managed to narrow the deficit to four (33-29) at halftime because of a few factors: a) Nikola Knezevic managed to steady the team offensively, b) the front court grouping of Boykin, Hardin, and Kamp was effective (+9 in 3:13), and c) they went the rest of the half with three big people out of Hardin, Boykin, Anderson, Kamp, and Wilkes. So what happens in the second half? The Bears open with the exact same starting lineup and gradually go from being down four to being down nine, before Knezevic is brought in to supply some poise to the offense. The frontcourt grouping of Boykin, Hardin, and Kamp never took the court together in the second half, although the Bears didn't go back to just having two bigs until they were down 10 with less than two minutes left. The most aggravating part is that this exact same scenario took place against Oregon a couple of weeks ago. The starting lineup fell behind 8-0 and eventually 11-4 before a substitution was made. The Bears scraped their way back to a two-point deficit (34-32) at halftime. The same starting lineup goes back out and went from being down two to being down 10 before a substitution was made. First vs. Second Half (minimum 2 minutes) First Half Top - Nikola Knezevic - 16-8, +8 First Half Bottom - Ryan Anderson - 20-33, -13 With Harper Kamp in 17 minutes - 37-28, +9 With Nikola Knezevic in 14 minutes - 30-25, +5 With Jamal Boykin in 23 minutes - 43-39, +4 With Eric Vierneisel in 12 minutes - 15-29, -14 With Ryan Anderson in 34 minutes - 55-72, -17 With Jerome Randle in 28 minutes - 41-60, -19 Lineups Take away the play of the starting lineup and the Bears played Stanford even. Starting lineup Point guard combinations
Big player combinations
Big player combinations summary
Contribution Evaluation
Description: This stat measures the significance of a player's contribution to the team's effort. If a team wins by 10 points, and a player plays in half of the team's minutes, his expected contribution would be a +5. For example, when Cal defeated Grambling by 19 points. Brian Wethers played 28 minutes or 70% of the game. If we multiply 70% x +19, Wethers' expected contribution would be a +13.30. But for the game he was a +26, so his net for the game for a +12.70. In a perfect team situation, if everyone contributed equally, the difference column would consist of a row of zeros. Stanford combined
Two numbers standout here: how much better the Bears do when Harper Kamp is in the game, and how much worse they do when Eric Vierneisel's playing. During the 28 minutes that Kamp played, the Bears outscored Stanford 61-43, for a +18. During the 52 minutes that he was on the bench, the Bears were outscored 118-85 (-33), for an overall difference of 51 points. Kamp topped the plus/minus against Stanford in both games, with a +9 each time. Although three Bears had a combined -20, Vierneisel stands out because his total was achieved in just 45 minutes. During that time, the Bears were outscored 100-80. During the 35 minutes that he rested, Cal outscored Stanford 66-61, or was a +5, for an overall difference of 25 points. ©Copyright 2008, TheBearInsider.com and Scout.com. All rights reserved. If you haven't done so already, subscribe to The Bear Insider so you can participate in this online community and get access to the members-only content from the nationwide Insiders network. Bear Insider staff writers visit the Insider discussion board regularly, and are available to discuss questions you may have about this article and Cal Athletics. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
MAGAZINE COVERAGE | |
|
|
NEW! Free Email Newsletter |
|
| Don't miss any news or features from TheBearInsider.com. Subscribe to our newsletter to have our newest articles emailed to you on a daily or weekly basis. | |
|