
|
|
With hours counting down until California's first-round game against North Carolina State, it's time to squeeze in another perspective about Cal, North Carolina State, Texas and Penn. Given the road records of the first three teams as well as their records in the last 10 games, no team has been clearly dominant. Regardless of who wins on Friday, Sunday's game is far, far from a foregone conclusion.
|
| One of the key criteria that the NCAA Tournament Selection committee
looks at in evaluating teams in quality wins. And just about every major conference team
in the tournament has a couple of quality wins. The problem is that most of those quality
wins were at home, and the NCAA Tournament is generally not played at home. In looking at
Cal and the other three teams that will be bracketed with them in Dallas, give careful
consideration to two facts - how well the team plays away from home, and how well they've
been playing down the stretch. Each team below has two sets of charts - one chart shows
the team's away games along with its postseason tourney games, the scores, the opponent's
RPI and whether or not the the opponent is an NCAA team.
The second chart shows the same information, only for the team's last 10 games |
 |
California Golden Bears
(20-10,
12-6 conf., #55 RPI) 8-6 Road, 6-4 Last 10 |
| |
ROAD |
|
|
RPI |
NCAA? |
| 11/18 |
Eastern Michigan |
65-67 |
L |
306 |
|
| 12/10 |
Kansas |
56-69 |
L |
20 |
Y |
| 12/29 |
USC |
62-58 |
W |
117 |
|
| 12/31 |
UCLA |
68-61 |
W |
10 |
Y |
| 1/13 |
Stanford |
61-75 |
L |
86 |
|
| 1/19 |
Arizona St. |
88-58 |
W |
180 |
|
| 1/21 |
Arizona |
55-60 |
L |
23 |
Y |
| 2/2 |
Oregon St. |
69-52 |
W |
174 |
|
| 2/4 |
Oregon |
62-60 |
W |
147 |
|
| 2/23 |
Washington St. |
43-41 |
W |
166 |
|
| 2/26 |
Washington |
62-73 |
L |
35 |
Y |
| 3/9 |
USC N |
82-67 |
W |
117 |
|
| 3/10 |
Oregon N |
91-87 |
W |
147 |
|
| 3/11 |
UCLA N |
52-71 |
L |
10 |
Y |
| Note: Cal's 68-61 win over UCLA is the highlight
here, but was more than three months ago. The Bears went 1-4 on the road
against other NCAA teams that ended up becoming #2, #4, #5 and #8 seeds, and were able to
remain competitive for most of the time during those four losses. It's a significant
reversal from past years when Cal's road games against the Pac-10 elite would result in a
majestic beatdown or two. Tossing aside the opening loss to Eastern Michigan when
the Bears were depleted with injuries, they've generally beaten the teams they were
supposed to beat, which shouldn't be taken for granted considering there are 40 teams in
the NIT that didn't. Should the Bears get past North Carolina State and have to face
Texas, they'll give the Longhorns a difficult game. |
| |
LAST 10 |
|
|
RPI |
NCAA? |
| 2/9 |
Stanford |
65-62 |
W |
86 |
Y |
| 2/16 |
Arizona |
75-66 |
W |
23 |
|
| 2/18 |
Arizona St. |
64-65 |
L |
180 |
|
| 2/23 |
at Washington St. |
43-41 |
W |
166 |
|
| 2/26 |
at Washington |
62-73 |
L |
35 |
Y |
| 3/2 |
UCLA |
58-67 |
L |
10 |
Y |
| 3/4 |
USC |
71-60 |
W |
117 |
|
| 3/9 |
USC N |
82-67 |
W |
117 |
|
| 3/10 |
Oregon N |
91-87 |
W |
147 |
|
| 3/11 |
UCLA N |
52-71 |
L |
10 |
Y |
| Note: It's hard to draw a bead on exactly how good
the Bears are. On one hand, they went 1-3 against teams in the RPI top 35, on the other
they went 4-1 against teams that had an RPI of 117 or lower. Cal finished 6-4 coming down
the stretch, with one good win (Arizona), one bad loss (Arizona State) and one very good
loss (the OT loss to UCLA). In the Washington and 2nd UCLA loss, the Bears let the
game get away from them in the last 10 minutes of the game. The Bears have played most of
their games very tight; regardless of the quality of the opposition. While almost
every player has increased their free throw shooting percentage substantially this year,
one more made free throw in regulation against Arizona State and UCLA, and this is all of
a sudden an 8-2 chart with an added win over an RPI #10 team. |
 |
North Carolina State Wolfpack (21-9, 10-6 conf., #51 rpi)
Road 6-6, Last 10 5-5 |
|
ROAD |
|
|
RPI |
NCAA? |
| 11/26 |
Notre Dame |
61-48 |
W |
95 |
|
| 11/30 |
Iowa |
42-45 |
L |
7 |
Y |
| 12/22 |
Alabama |
68-64 |
W |
57 |
Y |
| 1/7 |
North
Carolina |
69-82 |
L |
12 |
Y |
| 1/10 |
Boston
College |
78-60 |
W |
22 |
Y |
| 1/18 |
Duke |
68-81 |
L |
1 |
Y |
| 1/29 |
Clemson |
94-85 |
W |
77 |
|
| 2/8 |
Miami |
86-77 |
W |
78 |
|
| 2/12 |
Georgia Tech |
68-71 |
L |
160 |
|
| 2/18 |
Virginia Tech |
70-64 |
W |
146 |
|
| 3/4 |
Wake Forest |
63-76 |
L |
85 |
|
| 3/10 |
Wake
Forest N |
71-82 |
L |
85 |
|
| Note: North Carolina State was finished with all
of their tough road games two months ago, highlighted with wins over Alabama and an
18-point clubbing of Boston College. Nonetheless, the road record was 6-6, and they
ended up splitting the last six. Considering that no team was higher than an RPI #77, and
none of the wins was by more than 10 points, the Wolfpack weren't exactly striking fear
into the hearts of opponents. |
|
LAST 10 |
|
|
RPI |
NCAA? |
| 2/1 |
Virginia |
66-64 |
W |
79 |
|
| 2/5 |
Maryland |
62-58 |
W |
49 |
|
| 2/8 |
at
Miami |
86-77 |
W |
78 |
|
| 2/12 |
at
Georgia Tech |
68-71 |
L |
160 |
|
| 2/15 |
Florida
St. |
86-64 |
W |
63 |
|
| 2/18 |
at
Virginia Tech |
70-64 |
W |
146 |
|
| 2/22 |
North
Carolina |
71-95 |
L |
12 |
Y |
| 2/25 |
Boston
College |
72-74 |
L |
22 |
Y |
| 3/4 |
at
Wake Forest |
63-76 |
L |
85 |
|
| 3/10 |
Wake
Forest N |
71-82 |
L |
85 |
|
| Note: Few teams have less momentum coming into the
tournament than North Carolina State. Four straight losses including back-to-back thuds to
conference doormat Wake Forest have turned a once-promising season into a plain ol'
season. Our of their last 10 games, they haven't had to play a strong team on the
road - facing RPI #78 Miami, #160 Georgia Tech, #146 Virginia Tech, and #85 Wake Forest -
and even with that the Wolfpack went 2-2. |
 |
Texas (27-6, 13-3 conf, #8,RPI) Road 9-3, Last
10 7-3 |
| |
ROAD |
|
|
RPI |
NCAA? |
| 12/5 |
at Rice |
85-58 |
W |
218 |
|
| 1/2 |
at Memphis |
69-58 |
W |
4 |
Y |
| 1/9 |
at Iowa State |
78-58 |
W |
93 |
|
| 1/21 |
at Baylor |
66-47 |
W |
167 |
|
| 2/1 |
at Missouri |
66-53 |
W |
139 |
|
| 2/6 |
at Texas Tech |
65-44 |
W |
136 |
|
| 2/19 |
at Oklahoma St. |
60-81 |
L |
89 |
|
| 2/22 |
at Kansas St. |
65-64 |
W |
110 |
|
| 3/1 |
at Texas A&M |
43-46 |
L |
44 |
Y |
| 3/10 |
vs. Texas Tech N |
77-70 |
W |
136 |
|
| 3/11 |
vs. Texas
A&M N |
74-70 |
W |
44 |
Y |
| 3/12 |
vs. Kansas N |
68-80 |
L |
20 |
Y |
| Note: Texas has done well on the road, their 9-3
record being highlighted by a win over RPI #4 Memphis. They had a series of decent
wins against the soft underbelly of the Big 12 conference, but the 21-point loss at
Oklahoma State showed that they're fully capable of throwing up a stinker. In the
past month, they've played four games against RPI top 100 teams and they've gone 1-3, and
the one win was a four-point victory. |
|
LAST 10 |
|
|
RPI |
NCAA? |
| 2/11 |
Nebraska |
78-59 |
W |
96 |
|
| 2/14 |
Baylor |
90-63 |
W |
167 |
|
| 2/19 |
at Oklahoma St. |
60-81 |
L |
89 |
|
| 2/22 |
at Kansas St. |
65-64 |
W |
110 |
|
| 2/25 |
Kansas |
80-55 |
W |
20 |
Y |
| 3/1 |
at
Texas A&M |
43-46 |
L |
44 |
Y |
| 3/5 |
Oklahoma |
72-48 |
W |
16 |
Y |
| 3/10 |
Texas Tech N |
77-70 |
W |
136 |
|
| 3/11 |
Texas
A&M N |
74-70 |
W |
44 |
Y |
| 3/12 |
Kansas
N |
68-80 |
L |
20 |
Y |
| Note: Texas had four blowout wins in their last 10
games, but all of those wins were at home. Away from Austin, their best win has been
a 7-point victory over RPI #136 Texas Tech. Having the Big 12 Tournament in Dallas,
did not appear to give the Longhorns any added boost relative to the scoreboard.
While going 3-2 in five games against RPI top 44 teams is respectable, it's not going to
encourage anyone to pencil them into the Final Four on their bracket sheet. Their
lack of dominance makes them very much beatable, even this weekend. |
 |
Pennsylvania Quakers
(20-8, 12-2 conf., #98 rpi) 8-4
Road, 8-2 Last 10 |
| |
ROAD |
|
|
RPI |
NCAA? |
| 12/7 |
Duke |
59-72 |
L |
1 |
Y |
| 12/29 |
Hawaii |
58-55 |
W |
100 |
|
| 12/31 |
BYU-Hawaii |
72-62 |
W |
NA |
|
| 1/4 |
Citadel |
84-49 |
W |
320 |
|
| 1/9 |
Fordham |
63-78 |
L |
134 |
|
| 2/10 |
Dartmouth |
51-70 |
W |
311 |
|
| 2/11 |
Harvard |
81-68 |
W |
214 |
|
| 2/17 |
Columbia |
57-59 |
L |
289 |
|
| 2/18 |
Cornell |
67-56 |
W |
207 |
|
| 3/3 |
Yale |
57-55 |
W |
197 |
|
| 3/4 |
Brown |
74-68 |
W |
273 |
|
| 3/7 |
Princeton |
59-60 |
L |
199 |
|
| Note: A respectable loss to Duke is the high point
here. Penn hasn't played any other exceptionally difficult teams. In fact Hawaii is the
only other opponent in the top 100, and Penn beat them in Hawaii which isn't easy to do.
Other than the Hawaii win, the best road win was over RPI #197 Yale, yet was by
just two points. However, they also lost to #289 Columbia. The biggest road
loss was to #134 Fordham by 15 points, which suggests that Penn could give Texas quite a
battle for a large chunk of the first half. |
|
LAST 10 |
|
|
RPI |
NCAA? |
| 2/10 |
at Dartmouth |
70-51 |
W |
311 |
|
| 2/11 |
at Harvard |
81-68 |
W |
214 |
|
| 2/14 |
Princeton |
60-41 |
W |
199 |
|
| 2/17 |
at Columbia |
57-59 |
L |
289 |
|
| 2/18 |
at Cornell |
67-56 |
W |
207 |
|
| 2/24 |
Harvard |
74-71 |
W |
214 |
|
| 2/25 |
Dartmouth |
68-52 |
W |
311 |
|
| 3/3 |
at Yale |
57-55 |
W |
197 |
|
| 3/4 |
at Brown |
74-68 |
W |
273 |
|
| 3/7 |
at Princeton |
59-60 |
L |
199 |
|
| Note: The two toughest teams that Penn played during
their final 10 games was RPI #197 Yale, who they beat by two points, and RPI #199
Princeton where they split two games. The only two teams in the NCAA with RPIs lower than
that are #206 Southern and #272 Hampton - the two play-in teams. |
©Copyright 2006, TheBearInsider.com and Scout.com. All rights reserved.
If you haven't done so already, subscribe to The Bear Insider so you can
participate in this online community and get access to the members-only content from the
nationwide Insiders network.
Bear Insider staff writers visit the Insider discussion board regularly,
and are available to discuss questions you may have about this article and Cal Athletics.
|